Do you want your own version of IndiKit?

Learn more

Livelihood Coping Strategies – Food Security (LCS-FS)

Indicator Level

Outcome
Impact

Indicator Wording

% of households applying Livelihood Coping Strategies related to food security, by severity (no use, Stress, Crisis, Emergency)

Indicator Purpose

The Livelihood Coping Strategies - Food Security (LCS-FS) Indicator measures the extent to which households adopt livelihood coping strategies in response to food insecurity. It captures the medium- to long-term capacity of households to maintain access to food under stress or crisis conditions; it is a key component in assessing food security.

How to Collect and Analyse the Required Data

Determine the indicator's value by using the following methodology:

1) Identify Relevant Livelihood Coping Strategies: The first task is to identify the most common coping strategies households use to manage food access challenges. Consult Cash Working Group or other local coordination bodies for existing lists of such strategies and review them for local relevance using focus group discussions with affected populations. Select approximately 10 coping strategies balanced across severity groups: four stress, three crisis, and three emergency strategies.

 

2) Determine Severity Weights for Each Coping Strategy: Assign severity weights based on WFP categorisation of coping strategies into stress (weight = 1), crisis (weight = 2), and emergency (weight = 3) levels. Severity reflects the magnitude of negative impacts on future household food security and livelihood sustainability. Use locally validated severity classifications developed through focus group discussions with the affected populations, ensuring weights remain consistent for comparability.

 

3) Conduct a Household Survey Using a Standardised Questionnaire: Interview a representative sample of households using probability sampling. Ask whether each strategy was used within the recall period. Survey response options should include:

   - Yes (used within recall period)

   - No, not necessary

   - No, exhausted (already sold assets or could not continue practice within the last 12 months)

   - Not applicable (household never had access to this strategy)

    - Prefer not to answer

Train enumerators to minimise "prefer not to answer" responses through clear explanations and trust building.

 

4) Calculate the Livelihood Coping Strategies – Food Security Score: Multiply each "Yes" response by its assigned severity weight and sum all weighted responses to generate the household’s total LCS-FS score. Higher scores indicate greater use and severity of livelihood coping strategies related to food security.

 

5) Classify Households by Coping Severity Category: Categorise household scores into four groups defined by WFP or coordinating groups:

    - None (no negative coping used)

    - Stress

    - Crisis

    - Emergency

These bands reflect increasing levels of livelihood stress and food insecurity risk.

 

6) Report Indicator Values: Always report two main indicators:

    - % of households in each coping severity category (none, stress, crisis, emergency)

    - average LCS-FS score across all surveyed households

Disaggregate by

Disaggregate data by relevant criteria, including female-headed households, geographic location, socioeconomic status, and other context-important factors.

Important Comments

1) Consider reporting also the prevalence of "exhausted" coping strategies to understand the depletion of livelihood assets and predict future vulnerability.

 

2) The LCS-FS methodology requires contextual adaptation, but must maintain comparability with standard severity weights and classification thresholds. Always consult the recommendations provided by relevant coordination groups (e.g., a Cash Working Group) who should lead this process locally.

 

3) Ensure consistent recall period for coping strategies (7 or 30 days) to ensure data comparability.

 

4) The Livelihood Coping Strategies indicator exists in two versions: For food security (= this indicator) and for essential needs (available on this site). The version for essential needs should be used in Essential Needs Analysis, or whenever the context is broader than food security. The Food Security version should be used when a narrow focus on food security is intended.

 

5) Refer to the full WFP LCS-FS guidance for detailed methodology, example questionnaires, and analysis guidance (see below).

This guidance was prepared by People in Need (PIN) based on guidance developed by WFP's VAM Resource Centre ©
Propose Improvements